Iroquois vs Native/Alaskan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Native/Alaskan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Iroquois
Natives/Alaskans
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Native/Alaskan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,631,690 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.628 and weighted average of 43.5%, a difference of 0.68%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 9.6% | 13.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 55.8% |
Range | 90.4% | 42.1% |
Mean | 45.4% | 39.8% |
Median | 46.1% | 41.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.2% | 34.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.1% | 45.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Natives/Alaskans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Ecuadorian (43.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Moroccan (43.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Bangladeshi (43.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cree (43.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |