Kenyan vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Kenyan
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Kenyans
Turks
16.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
32.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,122,330 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 22.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kenyan | Turkish |
Minimum | 0.77% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 73.5% | 71.9% |
Range | 72.7% | 71.4% |
Mean | 20.7% | 13.5% |
Median | 15.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.3% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Kenyans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Morocco (16.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Arab (16.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Portugal | 42.5 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 35.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 16.7% |
South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |