French American Indian vs Ghanaian Family Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Ghanaian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Ghanaians
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Ghanaian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,838,011 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,166,438 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 0.43%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 36.5% | 26.7% |
Range | 33.5% | 24.4% |
Mean | 13.9% | 9.9% |
Median | 11.7% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Ghanaians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |