Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Laotian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Laotian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Laotians
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Laotian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,784,385 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,727,554 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.12%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Laotian |
Minimum | 0.23% | 0.15% |
Maximum | 23.3% | 22.9% |
Range | 23.1% | 22.8% |
Mean | 11.0% | 10.9% |
Median | 10.8% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |