Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Norway Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Norway
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Norway
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Norway Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,784,385 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,674,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Norway |
| Minimum | 0.23% | 0.68% |
| Maximum | 23.3% | 41.6% |
| Range | 23.1% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 10.8% |
| Median | 10.8% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |