Argentinean vs Laotian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Laotian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Laotians
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Laotian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,727,554 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Laotian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.15% |
| Maximum | 23.9% | 22.9% |
| Range | 22.4% | 22.8% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 10.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Laotians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.23%), French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |