Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Alaskan Athabascan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Alaskan Athabascans
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,466,412 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,962 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 83.2% | 72.7% |
Range | 81.1% | 71.3% |
Mean | 12.7% | 20.4% |
Median | 11.6% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 22.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Alaskan Athabascans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |