Immigrants from Ecuador vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Alaskan Athabascan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Alaskan Athabascans
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,825,114 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,962 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 5.2% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 22.6% | 72.7% |
Range | 17.4% | 71.3% |
Mean | 13.0% | 20.4% |
Median | 12.1% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 22.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |