Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Cherokee Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Cherokee
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Cherokee
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Cherokee Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,466,412 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.29%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Cherokee |
Minimum | 2.1% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 83.2% | 54.2% |
Range | 81.1% | 50.6% |
Mean | 12.7% | 17.8% |
Median | 11.6% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 20.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cherokee by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |