British West Indian vs Luxembourger Male Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Luxembourger
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Luxembourgers
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Luxembourger Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,618,428 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 53.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.21% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 30.9% | 17.8% |
Range | 30.7% | 16.3% |
Mean | 12.5% | 6.7% |
Median | 12.7% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Chippewa (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |