Immigrants from Oceania vs South American Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
South American
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
South Americans
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs South American Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,269,778 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 12.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | South American |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 14.8% |
Range | 11.9% | 13.6% |
Mean | 6.0% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.1% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Sudanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Subsaharan African (5.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |