Immigrants from Oceania vs Ottawa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Ottawa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Ottawa
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
54.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Ottawa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,836,436 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Ottawa |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 11.5% |
Range | 11.9% | 10.0% |
Mean | 6.0% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.1% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Ottawa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Albanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Delaware (5.1%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Immigrants from Uganda (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.85%), Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |