Immigrants from Oceania vs South American Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,304,848 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 28.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,371,298 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 1.0%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Oceania	South American
Minimum	17.3%	12.7%
Maximum	39.5%	66.7%
Range	22.2%	53.9%
Mean	29.5%	30.1%
Median	28.9%	29.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	24.7%	26.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	34.3%	32.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.6%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.8%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.7%	7.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and South Americans by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (28.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Kenyan (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Nicaraguan (28.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Costa Rican (28.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Syria (28.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (28.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
South Americans	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 28.4%
Kenyans	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 28.4%
Nicaraguans	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 28.4%
Costa Ricans	99.8 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	99.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	99.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 28.3%
Colombians	99.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 28.3%
Liberians	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%