Immigrants from Micronesia vs Spanish American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Spanish American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Spanish American Indians
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Spanish American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,598,516 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,136,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 4.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 5.5% | 7.6% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 48.9% |
Range | 23.0% | 41.2% |
Mean | 15.2% | 16.8% |
Median | 14.1% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 17.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Spanish American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.64%), German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.78%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |