Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Uruguay
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Uruguay
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,598,516 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,241,940 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 4.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Minimum | 5.5% | 6.4% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 21.5% |
Range | 23.0% | 15.1% |
Mean | 15.2% | 13.7% |
Median | 14.1% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Uruguay by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are American (14.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 1.5%), Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |