Liberian vs Spanish American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Liberian
Spanish American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Liberians
Spanish American Indians
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Spanish American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,038,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,136,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.70%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Liberian | Spanish American Indian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 7.6% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 48.9% |
| Range | 43.6% | 41.2% |
| Mean | 15.7% | 16.8% |
| Median | 14.0% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Spanish American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |