Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chinese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chinese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chinese
15.2%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chinese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,066,405 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 85.0% |
| Range | 95.6% | 84.1% |
| Mean | 25.0% | 19.0% |
| Median | 16.4% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Chinese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Moldova (15.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Bangladeshi (15.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Paraguayan (15.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Cameroon (15.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Japanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Bangladeshis | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Paraguayans | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Japanese | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Mongolians | 99.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Kenyans | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Maltese | 99.6 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |