Immigrants from Israel vs Ute Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Ute
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Ute
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Ute Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,619,232 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 54.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Ute |
Minimum | 3.3% | 18.0% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.2% | 82.0% |
Mean | 16.3% | 43.7% |
Median | 16.3% | 37.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 27.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 43.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 23.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 22.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Pakistan (18.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |