Immigrants from Israel vs Portuguese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Portuguese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Portuguese
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Portuguese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,619,232 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,230,754 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 20.5%, a difference of 11.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Portuguese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 50.5% |
Range | 25.2% | 49.2% |
Mean | 16.3% | 23.2% |
Median | 16.3% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 27.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Pakistan (18.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |