Immigrants from Israel vs Filipino Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Filipino
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Filipinos
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Filipino Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,619,232 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,336,668 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 8.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Filipino |
Minimum | 3.3% | 5.2% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 43.4% |
Range | 25.2% | 38.2% |
Mean | 16.3% | 15.8% |
Median | 16.3% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Filipinos by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (17.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |