Barbadian vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Barbadian
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Barbadians
Chinese
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,263,328 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 53.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 25.9% |
| Range | 29.8% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 15.3% | 10.8% |
| Median | 14.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |