Immigrants from India vs Luxembourger Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Luxembourger
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from India
Luxembourgers
6.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Luxembourger Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,464,451 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.457 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 15.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from India | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.60% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 11.3% | 13.1% |
Range | 10.7% | 12.7% |
Mean | 4.5% | 5.5% |
Median | 4.1% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India and Luxembourgers by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 4.3%), Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 6.0%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 6.6%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |