Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from India
Immigrants from Costa Rica
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
19.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,262,972 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,682,696 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 49.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from India | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
Minimum | 0.29% | 0.67% |
Maximum | 10.9% | 22.7% |
Range | 10.6% | 22.1% |
Mean | 2.9% | 5.8% |
Median | 2.7% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 2.1%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.7%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |