Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Turkish Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Turkish
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Turks
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Turkish Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,445,494 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,710,288 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422 and weighted average of 63.6%, a difference of 0.33%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Turkish |
| Minimum | 34.4% | 35.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 81.5% |
| Range | 65.6% | 45.8% |
| Mean | 64.8% | 65.5% |
| Median | 63.7% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.9% | 62.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.2% | 69.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Turks by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.030%), French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Blackfeet (63.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |