Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cajun Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cajun
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cajuns
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
69.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cajun Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,760,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,687,613 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 32.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cajun |
Minimum | 2.0% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.1% | 94.1% |
Mean | 11.4% | 21.9% |
Median | 11.4% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 25.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 12.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |