Hawaiian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hawaiians
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
37.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,430,861 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,955,182 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 21.2%, a difference of 0.16%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hawaiian | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
Minimum | 4.5% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 45.0% | 62.7% |
Range | 40.5% | 53.9% |
Mean | 23.0% | 20.6% |
Median | 20.9% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 23.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |