Ethiopian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,315,048 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 3.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 24.9% | 14.1% |
Range | 23.5% | 11.5% |
Mean | 8.5% | 8.4% |
Median | 8.2% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |