Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
82.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,166,810 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,315,048 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.25%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 14.1% |
Range | 97.0% | 11.5% |
Mean | 17.2% | 8.4% |
Median | 10.8% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 9.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |