Lithuanian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Italian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Lithuanians
Italians
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 410,552,780 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 551,674,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 2.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Italian |
Minimum | 0.39% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 78.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 77.7% | 98.0% |
Mean | 19.1% | 14.4% |
Median | 12.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.5% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.8% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.6% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Italians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Russian (13.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Moldova (13.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Australia (14.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |