Chinese vs Burmese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Burmese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Burmese
15.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Burmese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,001,827 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 0.41%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 85.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 84.1% | 96.8% |
| Mean | 19.0% | 26.6% |
| Median | 14.7% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 26.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 26.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Burmese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Brazilian (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (15.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (15.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |