Chilean vs Burmese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Burmese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Burmese
15.7%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Burmese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,217,238 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,001,827 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Burmese |
Minimum | 8.0% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.0% | 96.8% |
Mean | 27.3% | 26.6% |
Median | 18.2% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.4% | 25.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 26.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.2% | 26.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Burmese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are South American Indian (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Australian (15.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Australia (15.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Fijian (15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.7%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Brazilian (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (15.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (15.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Mexican American Indian (15.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Yaqui | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Fijians | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | Australia | 96.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.7% |