Chickasaw vs Comanche Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Comanche
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Comanche
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Comanche Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,339,334 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 2.6%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Comanche |
Minimum | 10.0% | 10.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.0% | 89.5% |
Mean | 31.9% | 38.4% |
Median | 25.2% | 42.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 50.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 31.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 21.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Comanche by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Celtic (18.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Ute (18.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Blackfeet (18.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hungarians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.5% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |