Chickasaw vs Comanche Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Comanche
Disability
Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Comanche
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Comanche Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,776,757 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 7.5%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Comanche |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 9.0% |
| Maximum | 52.4% | 55.6% |
| Range | 43.9% | 46.5% |
| Mean | 22.5% | 21.9% |
| Median | 20.7% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Comanche by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Chippewa (14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Osage (14.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |