Chickasaw vs Turkish Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Turkish
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Turks
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Turkish Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,864,079 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 20.3%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Turkish |
Minimum | 10.0% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 55.4% |
Range | 90.0% | 52.1% |
Mean | 31.9% | 19.6% |
Median | 25.2% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Africa (15.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bulgarian (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Latvia (15.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Danish (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Argentinean (15.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | Australia | 96.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Pakistanis | 95.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Turks | 95.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Africa | 95.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Bulgarians | 94.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.7 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Danes | 94.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Argentineans | 94.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.8% |