British West Indian vs Honduran Female Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Honduran
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Hondurans
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Honduran Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,544,045 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hondurans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British West Indian | Honduran |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 34.4% | 40.6% |
| Range | 32.6% | 37.0% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 21.0% |
| Median | 15.0% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Hondurans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hondurans are Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.19%), U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |