British West Indian vs Hispanic or Latino Female Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Hispanic or Latino
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Hispanics or Latinos
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Hispanic or Latino Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,030,648 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 16.6%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Hispanic or Latino |
Minimum | 1.8% | 11.3% |
Maximum | 34.4% | 39.4% |
Range | 32.6% | 28.1% |
Mean | 14.9% | 17.5% |
Median | 15.0% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Hispanics or Latinos by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Somali (16.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Mexican (16.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |