British West Indian vs Colville Female Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Colville
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Colville
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Colville Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,683,494 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 4.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Colville |
Minimum | 1.8% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 34.4% | 55.0% |
Range | 32.6% | 50.1% |
Mean | 14.9% | 24.0% |
Median | 15.0% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 27.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Colville by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.93%), Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |