Apache vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Apache
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Apache
Creek
23.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,644,906 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 9.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache | Creek |
Minimum | 8.5% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
Range | 91.5% | 72.7% |
Mean | 45.4% | 31.3% |
Median | 37.9% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.6% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.0% | 40.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.4% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.0% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.7% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Kiowa (23.7%, a difference of 0.58%), Dominican (23.7%, a difference of 0.70%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and Central American Indian (22.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and African (21.9%, a difference of 0.89%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |