Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from the Azores Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from the Azores
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from the Azores
24.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from the Azores Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,594,140 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,979,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 23.5%, a difference of 2.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from the Azores |
Minimum | 6.9% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 64.3% |
Range | 43.1% | 63.0% |
Mean | 24.3% | 23.9% |
Median | 22.9% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from the Azores by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.020%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |