Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from the Azores
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from the Azores
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,248,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,193,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 6.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from the Azores |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 28.0% | 21.9% |
| Range | 25.9% | 20.7% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 8.8% |
| Median | 9.9% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from the Azores by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.95%), Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Cree (10.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |