Hmong vs Immigrants from the Azores Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
Immigrants from the Azores
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hmong
Immigrants from the Azores
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Immigrants from the Azores Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,642,418 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 23.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,979,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 23.5%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Immigrants from the Azores |
Minimum | 4.3% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 53.4% | 64.3% |
Range | 49.1% | 63.0% |
Mean | 25.8% | 23.9% |
Median | 22.9% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.5% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Immigrants from the Azores by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |