Australian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from China
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from China
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from China Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,020,538 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 41.9% | 26.5% |
| Range | 41.4% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 11.4% |
| Median | 10.5% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from China by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |