Australian vs Portuguese Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Portuguese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Australians
Portuguese
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Portuguese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,020,538 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,939,658 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 41.9% | 36.0% |
| Range | 41.4% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 11.7% |
| Median | 10.5% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Portuguese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |