Canadian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Immigrants from China
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Immigrants from China
11.6%
POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Immigrants from China Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,267,271 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.31%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.75% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 26.5% |
| Range | 99.2% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 24.7% | 11.4% |
| Median | 12.9% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.3% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Immigrants from China by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |