Argentinean vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Argentinean
Zimbabwean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Argentineans
Zimbabweans
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,059,037 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,044,520 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Argentinean | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 56.7% | 29.1% |
Range | 55.6% | 28.8% |
Mean | 13.3% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.9% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tlingit-Haida (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Taiwanese (14.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Austria (14.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |