Polish vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Polish
Zimbabwean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Poles
Zimbabweans
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,484,152 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,044,520 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.19%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 29.1% |
Range | 43.4% | 28.8% |
Mean | 14.9% | 11.0% |
Median | 13.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Philippines (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |