Argentinean vs Zimbabwean Vision Disability
COMPARE
Argentinean
Zimbabwean
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Argentineans
Zimbabweans
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Zimbabwean Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,071,793 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,201,681 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Argentinean | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.66% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 5.5% | 6.8% |
Range | 4.9% | 6.4% |
Mean | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.82% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.89% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.89% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Zimbabweans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Eastern European (2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (2.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |