Argentinean vs Scottish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Scottish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Scottish
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Scottish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,877,668 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Scottish |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 23.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 22.4% | 96.5% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 23.6% |
| Median | 10.2% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 28.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 23.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Scottish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.23%), French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |