Pima vs Tohono O'odham In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Pima
Tohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Pima
Tohono O'odham
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
77.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Tohono O'odham In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,711,323 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 77.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 46.4% | 46.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.6% | 53.6% |
Mean | 79.8% | 77.1% |
Median | 81.6% | 78.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.6% | 66.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.0% | 91.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 24.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Tohono O'odham by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.84%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and Apache (79.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |