Pima vs Crow In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Pima
Crow
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Pima
Crow
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
75.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Crow In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,195,148 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 75.9%, a difference of 4.1%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Crow |
Minimum | 46.4% | 32.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.6% | 67.6% |
Mean | 79.8% | 69.1% |
Median | 81.6% | 76.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.6% | 57.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.0% | 82.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Crow by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 1.5%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |